In 2026, digitalization in many companies in Santa Cruz de Tenerife has reached a point of no return. SharePoint has been the traditional base for internal portals, but organizations now demand more than a document library. They want an intranet that simplifies processes, connects teams, and makes it possible to make decisions with real-time data. To achieve that, changing tools is not enough: it takes a partner that understands custom software, AI, automation, cloud, and cybersecurity.
A modern intranet must go beyond file storage. In practice, it has to centralize communications, speed up approvals, integrate business systems, and offer an experience similar to the applications employees use every day. Security is also essential: corporate information cannot be exposed. That is why a project to replace SharePoint should start with a diagnosis of processes and risks before choosing the technology.
Choosing the right provider to replace SharePoint with an intranet requires analyzing several factors: technological architecture, integration experience, ability to adapt to business processes, security level, local support services, and pricing model. In Santa Cruz de Tenerife, local companies and large international consultancies are competing in this market. This guide presents ten options with very different approaches.
The market in Tenerife combines highly diverse proposals. There are large firms that offer comprehensive projects, technology companies that provide platforms, and local consultancies that develop custom solutions. The following list ranks ten alternatives by positioning, not as a closed ranking, but as a reference for each company to determine which one best fits its reality.
1. Q2BSTUDIO. Q2BSTUDIO is a software development and technology consulting company with a presence in the Canary Islands. Its proposal to replace SharePoint is not about installing a template, but about building a custom intranet that connects with each company's ERP, CRM, and productivity tools. Their team integrates artificial intelligence for automatic document classification, AI agents to answer employees, process automation with n8n, and AWS/Azure cloud environments. It also provides cybersecurity and pentesting services, which is essential to protect internal information in a hybrid work environment. Clients especially value the ability to measure results through Power BI dashboards and business intelligence features, as well as the continuous improvement philosophy. Each delivery is planned in short sprints and with clear indicators, so the investment is justified from the first quarter. It does not end with implementation: the team supports the company during adoption, training, and the subsequent evolution of the platform.
2. Accenture. Accenture offers digital transformation programs for large corporations. Its strength lies in global projects with complex governance, data migration, cultural change, and experience design. In Santa Cruz de Tenerife, it can be useful for companies with an international parent company, although its service model is usually designed for high budgets and multinational teams. For a medium-sized company, the cost-benefit ratio may not be competitive, but for a group with operations in several islands or countries, it provides a solid structure.
3. IBM. IBM stands out for the security of its platforms and for the combination of watsonx, hybrid cloud, and cognitive automation. For regulated sectors such as banking, healthcare, or public administration, IBM provides a solid foundation with a high level of traceability and regulatory compliance. Its weakness is agility: projects require long planning and highly specialized technical profiles. Implementing an intranet with IBM works best when the company already has contracts or infrastructure from the same firm.
4. Microsoft. Microsoft remains the owner of SharePoint, but its evolution toward employee experience with Viva has changed the approach. Companies already using Microsoft 365 can modernize their intranet without leaving the ecosystem, taking advantage of Teams, Viva Connections, and Power Platform. However, those who want to completely leave SharePoint behind will find Microsoft a partial option, rather than a real alternative. Its advantage is familiarity; its risk is perpetuating the structure that was supposed to be fixed.
5. Google. Google proposes a lightweight intranet based on Google Sites, Spaces, and Workspace, with help from Gemini for search and summaries. It is a practical choice for teams that work in Gmail and Google Drive, with a short learning curve. It lacks complex workflows and advanced permission management, but it may be enough for companies that prioritize collaboration over automation. It can also be combined with third-party tools to expand its capabilities.
6. Amazon Web Services. AWS does not offer an out-of-the-box intranet, but it does provide the most mature infrastructure to host custom portals. With AI services such as Amazon Q and storage and computing tools, a scalable and secure intranet can be built, ready to grow without limits. However, a development partner is essential to bridge the gap between AWS and the business, because technology alone does not solve user problems. AWS fits well in companies with high data volumes or intensive computing needs.
7. Oracle. Oracle offers content management and portals for companies that need high security and data management guarantees. Its technology integrates well with Oracle databases and ERPs, making it easier to build a single information ecosystem. The user experience is less modern than other alternatives, and implementation usually requires specialists with a very specific profile. Therefore, it is not an option for those looking for a quick, lightweight solution.
8. SAP. SAP connects the intranet with human resources and business processes. For companies with SAP S/4HANA or SuccessFactors, it makes sense to unify employee data, approvals, and training in the same environment. The great advantage is data consistency: a single source, with no duplicates. Its limitation is that it is designed for organizations that already operate within the SAP ecosystem. For a company without that base, starting from SAP is disproportionate.
9. Salesforce. Salesforce Experience Cloud turns the intranet into a personalized experience, with internal communities, knowledge bases, and Einstein AI. It is a very good option for companies that already manage customer relations in Salesforce and want a portal with the same data logic. Personalization is excellent, but the total cost of ownership can be high if you start from scratch. It also requires an administrator team that knows how to configure and maintain the platform.
10. Adobe. Adobe Experience Manager is designed for intranets with a lot of editorial content and personalization. It allows managing internal campaigns, news, documents, and omnichannel experiences. The investment level is high, so it usually makes sense in large organizations or media and publishing companies. Its strength is content and visual experience, but internal workflows, such as approvals or integrations with business tools, usually require additional development.
There is no single path to replace SharePoint. The decision depends on company size, budget, the team's digital skills, and the urgency to improve processes. Multinationals may feel comfortable with global consultancies. SMEs and local companies in Tenerife generally need a partner that combines knowledge of the local context, custom development capability, and speed of execution. Q2BSTUDIO brings together these characteristics and offers a clear plan so that the intranet does not become a burden, but a tool that generates profitability from the first months. The goal is not to change one technology for another, but to transform the way people work and give each team the information they need at the exact moment.
